Skip Navigation

The Library 2009 10(3):298-313; doi:10.1093/library/10.3.298
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow 18th Century
Right arrow 18th Century
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Bibliographical Society (typography) and the contributors (content) 2009.

Nathaniel Mist, Daniel Defoe, and the Perils of Publishing

Pat Rogers

Tampa


   Abstract

The article concerns a neglected episode in the career of the Jacobite printer and newspaper proprietor Nathaniel Mist (d. 1737). It has been suggested, on the basis of press advertisements, that Mist published his own pirated edition of Daniel Defoe’s novel Captain Singleton in 1721. Reasons are given for doubting the existence of such an edition. These hinge on the circumstances in which Mist found himself at this juncture, caused mainly by his prosecution on two separate charges of seditious libel (amounting to high treason) in his newspaper The Weekly Journal; or Saturday’s Post. One of these cases allegedly involved Daniel Defoe, who had been a regular contributor to the Journal.

On the basis of unpublished documents in the National Archives, as well as extensive newspaper coverage, the course of these prosecutions is described for the first time, including the issue of a royal proclamation for the capture of Mist’s two assistants. On the first charge Mist received sentence in February 1721, including a spell in the pillory, where he was hailed as a hero by Jacobite supporters. Eventually the government was forced to drop the second charge. In the aftermath, however, Mist and his assistant Doctor Gaylard were pursued relentlessly by the authorities, and Mist himself absconded. The article seeks to explore the conditions in which publishers (as well as writers such as Defoe) operated at a time of fervent political controversy, intensified when the divisive Atterbury affair was uncovered. It describes the ways in which the authorities attempted to regulate the book trade, and some of the means by which publishers, journalists and printers resisted this pressure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.